Saturday, July 12, 2014

Product Review of Muir Glen's Savory Lentil Soup

(Originally Published at Yahoo.Voices formerly Associated Content~10/28/2012)

BSTRACT: Muir Glen's Savory Lentil Soup is a rich and hearty soup that is entirely made from USDA certified organic ingredients, vegan and without MSG. This soup is every bit as good as my homemade lentil soup.

CONTENT:

In a previous article, I had written about my introduction to the Muir Glen's line of food products by trying Muir Glen's Garden Vegetable Soup which I had come across while shopping in my local Duane Reade store. I had been overall impressed by the fact that Muir Glen is a company that produces food products that are all USDA certified as being organic. (Update: Previous article about Muir Glen's Garden Vegetable Soup can be found HERE

The Muir Glen company's main and only crop are organically grown tomatoes and is based in the San Joaquin Valley of California. Their tomatoes are then used for a wide variety of food products, from canned diced, fire roasted, crushed, and whole tomatoes, salsa sauces, tomato sauces, tomato paste, pasta sauce, ketchup, and of course, a wide variety of soups which also for the most part are also tomato based. S ince I had already tried Muir Glen's Garden Vegetable soup, now it was time for me to try their Savory Lentil Soup.

For those who wish to know the ingredient facts of Muir Glen's Savory Lentil Soup, they are as follows:
Water, Lentils*, Carrots*, Celery*, Tomato Paste*, Corn Starch*. Also contains less than 1% Sea Salt, Extra Virgin Olive Oil*, Onion Powder*, Raw Sugar*, Parsley Flakes*, Black Pepper, and Thyme*. (*Organic)

Here are the Nutrition Facts:
Serving Size: 1 cup (251g), Servings Per Container: about 2. Calories 120 per serving, Calories from fat: 15, Total Fat: 1.5g (3%), Saturated Fat: 0g, Trans Fat: 0g, Polyunsaturated Fat: 0g, Monounsaturated Fat: 0g, Cholesterol: go, Sodium: 780g (33%), Total Carbohydrate: 23g (8%), Dietary fiber: 4g (16%), Sugars: 2g, Protein: 7g

First up, I must point out, that I'm an excellent cook in my own right and yes, I have done my own version of Lentil soup in the past, so I was curious if Muir Glen's version was up to par. In a word, yes! I have to admit since I'm now I'm on my own, I often take shortcuts, which means I'm not exactly cooking the way I used to, particularly in making soups, so if I can find a product that may be similar to my own home cooking I'm all the more willing to try it.

Now of course I have tried other soup company brands, such as the tried and true familiar Progresso and Campbell's brands. Each company has their own versions of Lentil soup, however, they are some flaws to both of them. The first is that while both companies use what can be considered as being natural ingredients, neither use ingredients that are certified as being organic but are instead are commercially grown and processed. Two, in the case of Campbell's Lentil soup, there is the added use of MSG (Monosodium Glutamate), and for the person who is vegan, this soup also contains Parmesan Cheese. Muir Glen's version of Lentil soup, is not only organic, contains no MSG, but is also completely vegan friendly.

And what is my opinion of Muir Glen's Savory Lentil Soup? In a word: fantastic! I found the soup to be every bit as tasty as my own homemade version. The tomato-based broth was rich and hearty and there were generous amounts of diced up carrots and sliced celery, and of course, the lentils themselves. This soup comes in a 14.8 oz can and is not condensed, so there is no need to add water, and while the label says this can of soup is enough for about two servings, like the prior soup I tried (Garden Vegetable) it too is actually more like one large serving. This is one of those soups that will be terrific for those chilly fall or winter nights. In a rating of one to ten, I give this a well-deserved ten!

If you wish to learn more about Muir Glen's products, visit their website

If you're unfortunate in that you can't find any of Muir Glen's products in your local store, you may order directly on-line here

Sources: Life




Product Review of Muir Glen's Garden Vegetable Soup

(Originally Published at Yahoo.Voices formerly Associated Content~10/14/2012)

ABSTRACT: Muir Glen's Garden Vegetable Soup is rich, hearty and favorable and has completely organic ingredients.

CONTENT:

Whenever I go grocery shopping, I'm always on the lookout for processed food products that contain natural ingredients, or better yet, foods that are made from organically grown methods. And yes, there is a difference between the labeling of foods as natural vs. organic. When any food product labels itself as containing all natural ingredients it can simply mean that particular product doesn't have any chemical or synthetic additives, yet may and will often contain foods grown by commercial means, which of course, may mean grown with pesticides and may also mean contains GMO/GE (Genetically Modified Organisms/Genetically Engineered) ingredients. For food items to be considered organic on the other hand, means that the food had to follow the strict standards set by the USDA , that is not commercially raised foods, pesticide free, and no GMO/GE ingredients. (1)(2) How can one tell if a food product is truly organic? Quite simply by looking on the label and there will be the USDA Organic seal on it.

When I think of it, I must look a rather comical sight when I do my grocery shopping as I'm always reading the ingredients labels like crazy, and this is true especially if I'm interested in purchasing a food item that I haven't tried before. This is exactly what I did when by chance I came across a variety of soups in my local Duane Reade store and made by the Muir Glen company. Now when I think of companies that make soup, of course I'm familiar with Campbell's, Progresso, Healthy Choice and so forth, but Muir Glen? I have to confess, I never heard of this company before. What did attract my attention was the fact that under the name of each Muir Glen soup variety it clearly stated "Organic" and yes, had the USDA Organic seal.

Since I love vegetable type soups, I picked out the can of Muir Glen's Garden Vegetable Soup which also states on the label that is Vegan and free of MSG. Here is the list of ingredients: Water, tomato puree (water, tomato paste), Diced Celery*, Carrots*, Tomatoes*, Corn*, Cut Green Beans*, Peas*, Potatoes*. Contains less than 1% of: Sea Salt, Corn Starch*, Onion Powder*, Red Bell Pepper*, Garlic Powder*, Basil*, Black Pepper*, Citric Acid, Oregano*, Calcium Chloride. *Organic


Here are the particulars for the Garden Vegetable Nutrition facts:

Serving size: 1 cup (251g)

Servings Per Container: about 2

Calories per serving: 70

Calories from Fat: 0

Total Fat : 0.5g 1%

Saturated Fat 0g 0%

Trans Fat 0g

Polyunsaturated Fat 0g

Monounsaturated fat 0g

Cholesterol 0mg 0%

Sodium 780mg 33%

Total Carbohydrate 14g 5%

Dietary Fiber 3g 11% Sugars 5g

Protein 3g


Now of course, the ultimate test itself, trying it. First of all, I have to point out that this is not a condensed soup therefore, one does not add water to it the way one might for any soup by Campbell's. Also, the can is only 14.9 oz, therefore a rather small-sized can and while the label specifies that the servings per container is about two, it's actually more like only one large serving. The base or stock of the soup is tomato, which I love, and I noticed a great blend of the vegetable ingredients; there were large slices of carrots, celery, and generous amounts of the other vegetables listed. There is one thing however that I need to point out and that concerns the sodium content of the soup which is 780mg, and may be rather high for those watching their sodium intake.


So, how did it taste? In one word: fantastic! I do have to admit that sometimes in the past, I've been disappointed with certain organic food products as they often tasted rather bland, but this soup has a great, rich hearty taste and very satisfying. In a rating scale of one to ten, I would rate it a ten, and can't wait to buy some more! I also can't wait to try some of their other products as well. With the company Muir Glen, and with my first introduction of their foods via their Garden Vegetable soup, I feel as though I've hit a goldmine of great taste and of a great company of products. The cost of this can of soup at my Duane Reade store was $3.99, a dollar or two more perhaps than most canned soups, but in my opinion well worth it.


If you want to learn more about Muir Glen and their food items that they produce which includes all of their tomato products, such as their canned diced, fire roasted, crushed and whole tomatoes, plus their salsas, sauces, ketchup and soups, visit their website


If you can't find their products at your store you can order on-line here



Sources:


Meaning of Natural Ingredients:


Natural Ingredients (1)


Natural News article (2)

Product Review: Review of Taste of Inspirations Neapolitan Pizza Sauce

(Originally Published at Yahoo.Voices formerly Associated Content~5/3/2012)

ABSTRACT: Despite being labeled a "Pizza" Sauce, Taste Of Inspirations Neapolitan Pizza Sauce can be used in a truly versatile manner for a variety of recipe dishes.

CONTENT: I recently had the wonderful good and great fortune of being sent a variety of jars of pasta sauces. This came about after I shared my product review article that I wrote here of Vito Marcello's Tomato Basil Marinara Sauce with none other than Vita Marcello himself on his Facebook page. He loved my article so much that he decided to send me four jars of different pasta sauces to me, of which this product review of Taste Of Inspirations Neapolitan Pizza Sauce is just one. UPDATE: My article review of Vito Marcello's Tomato Basil Marinara Sauce can now be found HERE

I have to admit when it came to choosing which pasta sauce Mr. Marcello sent me first I was a bit stymied, as they all sounded delicious, but finally decided on trying the 16 Oz. jar of Taste Of Inspirations Neapolitan Pizza Sauce first. Despite the name of being a "pizza sauce" I found it was versatile to use it in a number of different ways and I managed to whip up three different meals from it.

Now before I share my own recipes on how I used this sauce, let me share the ingredients of which are all natural and consists of: Tomatoes, Water, Onions, Pecorino Romano Cheese, Garlic, Canola Oil, Extra Virgin Olive Oil, Salt, White Pepper, Parsley, Basil, and Rosemary.

The complete Nutrition Facts of Taste Of Inspirations Neapolitan Pizza Sauce are as follows: One Serving Size which is 1/4 cup has 25 Calories, Calories from Fat 10, Total Fat is 1 gram, Saturated Fat 0 grams, Trans Fat 0 grams, Cholesterol 0 Mg, Sodium 160 grams, Total Carbohydrates 3 grams, Dietary Fiber less than 1 gram, Sugar 2 grams. Bottom line, this sauce is wonderfully low in calories, fat, carbohydrates, sodium and sugar, and therefore perfect for anyone's dietary needs.

Now for the good part, that is, how I used this sauce. The first meal I made using this sauce was my version of Spanish Rice. I'll try to give as precise measurements of all the ingredients, but as they say, good cooks don't measure and I've been cooking a long time, so measurements are approximate.

My own Spanish Rice dish:

2 or 3 tablespoons Olive Oil
1 small onion chopped
1 or 2 cloves garlic minced
1 cup uncooked white rice
approximately 3/4 cup of Taste Of Inspirations Neapolitan Pizza Sauce
2 cups water
1 cup precooked Chicken breast cut into cubes**
1/2 cup Cooked Kidney Beans***
Optional:
One plum tomato sliced and diced
Half of one large green bell pepper, seeds removed, sliced and diced

In large skillet, heat Olive Oil over medium heat and add the chopped onions and minced garlic and sauté for a few minutes, add uncooked rice and continue to stir until rice is slightly browned. Add the Taste Of Inspirations Neapolitan Pizza Sauce and stir again, then add the 2 cups of water and again stir to blend. Finally add the cubed Chicken Breast and Kidney Beans, diced tomato and green pepper if used, stir once more, reduce heat to low and cover. Let simmer, stirring occasionally to prevent sticking for approximately 20 minutes or until all liquid is absorbed.

My version of Spanish rice can a great one dish meal (with chicken added) and can provide 2 healthy servings.
**This is also a great as a side dish with chicken if the chicken is omitted in the rice, and can serve up to four people.
***If you wish to have this as a more vegetarian type one dish--again omit the chicken and instead of only 1/2 cup cooked Kidney Beans, can add 3/4 of a cup beans instead. 2 Servings.

Now for my second recipe using Taste Of Inspirations Neapolitan Pizza Sauce:

Homemade Tuna Fish Cakes "Parmesan"

Two 5 Oz. Cans of Solid White Albacore Tuna (brand of your choice)
--drained of water or oil and rinsed under cold water in a strainer
One egg
approximately 1 cup flavored/seasoned breadcrumbs of your choice of brand ( I use 4-C)
2 tablespoons Olive Oil
approximately 1 cup of Taste Of Inspirations Neapolitan Pizza Sauce
Grated and/or shredded cheese of your choice: either Parmesan, Muenster or Mozzarella OR a bit of a blending of all if you wish

In a medium sized mixing bowl add the tuna and crumble up until tuna is in smaller pieces. Add egg and blend with hands. Pour breadcrumbs onto a plate, and take one-quarter of the tuna/egg mixture and form into a pattie or "fishcake" then place in breadcrumbs to give a coating of the breadcrumbs. One should have four patties.

Add the 2 tablespoons of Olive Oil into a large skillet and place the tuna fishcakes into skillet, allowing to brown for a few minutes, turn patties over to brown on the other side. Remove from heat.

Lightly grease a square or round 8" cake type pan and place fishcakes into pan. Pour enough of the Taste Of Inspirations Neapolitan Pizza Sauce on top of each fishcake to cover each one. On top of each fishcake then add the cheese or blend of cheeses of your choice, the exact amount is up to individual taste, but at least 1/4 of a cup. Place in a pre-heated oven at 350º degrees and let bake at least 15 minutes or until cheese is bubbly and melted.
Servings 4

Suggested side dishes: Pasta of your choice either spaghetti, rotini, or linguine; or mashed potatoes plus other vegetable of your choice

Well, now I had a dilemma on my hands! Most of the Taste Of Inspirations Neapolitan Pizza Sauce was nearly gone and not enough to make a full meal out of, ah, but being rather creative and not wanting the sauce to go to waste I came up with a solution and used the last of the sauce for how it was meant to be used...yes pizza!

English Muffin Pizza:

I was having a case of the late night snack attacks and wanted something to eat but didn't know what and then the idea came to me to have English Muffin Pizza! The recipe is very simple. Just take one English Muffin and slice in half if not already pre-sliced. I added the very last remaining Taste Of Inspirations Neapolitan Pizza Sauce equally on each half...about 1/4 cup each. Add approximately 1/4 cup of grated or shredded cheese of choice...I had shredded Muenster cheese at the time. In a pre-heated oven of 350º "bake" until cheese is bubbly and melted. How simple, right? And so delicious!
One serving.

From my recipes, you can see how wonderfully versatile Taste Of Inspirations Neapolitan Pizza Sauce really is. Now the "bad" news. You may discover that this brand of pasta sauce is hard to find in your own supermarket. According to the Vito Marcello website, one will most likely find it at a Stop and Shop, Hannaford, Giant or Market Basket supermarket or one can order directly via the Hannaford website itself and costs $3.49 per 16 Oz. jar (plus shipping charges). It's well worth ordering this sauce however, since as I discovered this rich and hearty sauce allowed me to create some really diverse and great meals. Just think of the possibilities you can come up with. It's a winner in my book!

Sources:

Life

To Order:
Hannaford website

For more information about Vito Marcello:
Vito Marcello website

ARTICLE: You Are What You Eat: What Exactly ARE You Eating Though? Part 1

(Originally Published at Yahoo.Voices formerly Associated Content~3/26/2012)

ABSTRACT: While we have enormous choices of the kinds of food we have available to eat, do we really know just what we're eating and more important, is it safe?

CONTENT: It would be nearly impossible for me to write an in-depth article concerning the food we eat and the safety factors in one contained article, therefore, I plan to write a series of which this is Part I.

This series is meant to be a basic overview of all aspects of the food industry, not just one and I hope to touch base with each issue concerning our food supply. I will provide as many links to articles about the food industry, the same ones I've been reading up on while doing my research should one decide to do a more in-depth research on their own on all the topics I touch here in my series. There have been many factors that have inspired me to write such a series of articles, some of which I have known about for years but never really thought of doing my own in-depth research until fairly recently. What kept running through my mind as I continued to read one article after another, I began asking myself, why did we as a collective whole, turn a simple thing like food and how it is grown, raised or processed into something so complicated and not necessarily for the better and in many cases downright unhealthy? Why despite our so-called sophisticated technology do we hear of more and more recalls of foods due to E. coli, salmonella, or listeria contamination? Not one week goes by without some major recall of food, and not just food for humans, but for pets as well. In the past there have been recalls of tomatoes, peanut butter, lettuce, spinach, blueberries, cantaloupes, eggs, ground turkey, ground beef, frozen beef patties, and those are the "major" ones that are announced on the news; there have been scores of other foods that are recalled that the average American doesn't even know about, unless that is, one is subscribed to the USDA recall page itself here. Another thing that also cropped up in my mind, the more I read, the more I honestly began believing that the only way I could be certain what was safe to eat would be for me to literally go out and buy my own farm and raise everything myself, or to completely forget about ever buying any foods or meats unless it was one-hundred percent organic or humanely raised; this isn't just a sentiment of mine, but with others I've been discussing this with. Unfortunately, for most of us, neither solution is practical; we all can't run out and get our own farms, nor can we expect to always buy everything "organic" since the vast majority of food in supermarkets are commercially grown and/or raised, and there is also the cost factor as organic or humanely raised foods are so much more expensive.

When we walk into a supermarket we are literally bombarded with every kind of food imaginable, and not only your "typical" expected food products that the "American" diet consists of, but often we can find foods from around the world and from every culture. Gone are the days where one could only eat fruits and vegetables that were in season, such as was in the case of say in my great-grandparents or grandparents time. Back in those times, if one wanted foods year round not in season, one had to resort to "canning" food, that is, going through the time-consuming process of blanching/preparing the food and store in glass Mason jars. Today, we take it for granted that we can buy fruits and vegetables not in season in our own country year round due to them being grown in other countries where they are in season.

In your supermarket, you will find row upon row of select enticing array of meats carefully arranged and beautifully wrapped up in their packages. Don't want a whole chicken or turkey? No problem, you can choose from just drumsticks, either with skin or not, or breasts (again skin or not), ground chicken and/or turkey, chicken and/or turkey wings. The list of select cuts of beef, pork, duck and other meats are also endless. However, does the average person actually know how most farm animals for food consumption are raised?

Then of course are the overwhelming and staggering selections of frozen foods, from vegetables, fruits, entree upon entree of self-contained whole dinners for one person or family sized, pizzas, and even frozen foods that are more "vegetarian/vegan" friendly.

With all this food at our fingertips, it all sounds like sheer heaven, doesn't it? The question is though, do you really know with firm conviction what exactly is in your food, whether fresh produce, meats or processed foods? Is it really enough for instance, to read labels of processed foods to see what ingredients are contained in them? And more important do you even understand what those all ingredients are without needing a Ph.D in chemistry? Also, did you know that with the labeling of food products here in America, companies are NOT obligated to alert the American consumer if their food product contains GE/GMO ingredients, while such labeling exists in other countries? (1) (2) If you don't know what GE/GEO means, you'll find out in this series of articles of mine.

I think the goal of many of us is to naturally eat as healthy as possible, and thus hopefully are probably more aware of what is in the food we eat, or are we? To give an example, today's consumer may be cutting down on any food that contains high levels of saturated fats due to all the past studies of the health risks; but what about those other ingredients in foods that we may have been eating or drinking for years that also pose possible health risks, and yet still remain in our foods?

The real irony of it all, is that government agencies such as the FDA, USDA and EPA which are supposed to protect us and be "watchdogs" for the well being and safety for its people still allows all too many unsafe, unhealthy practices to continue in the food industry world and despite any scientific evidence found, public input, or protests in the matter continues to be listened to these agencies with deaf ears.

THE SAFETY FACTOR OF PROCESSED FOOD CONTAINERS

Before I examine what ingredients in our foods may pose a health risk or hazard to us, I have to touch on the subject of just how safe the containers our commercially processed foods are kept in, that is, canned foods and the foods or drinks in plastic containers. Gone are the days when a person could purchase some processed food or drink that were in glass containers of any kind, from bottles to jars. I remember vividly as a child we had milk delivered to us and it was in glass bottles; once used, we'd left the empty bottles in front of our door and the milkman would pick them up to be reused and he'd give us new bottles of milk. Sodas, ketchup, mayonnaise, mustard, salad dressings, relishes, even baby bottles were all made of glass years ago. Glass posed an on-going problem however, for as let's face it, glass is heavier than plastic and of course, breakable, also when glass was the primary container for foods or drinks decades ago, the concept of recycling them didn't exist then as it does now.

The plastic world isn't as new as one would think, in fact the first form of plastic was invented circa 1862, however it wasn't until 1947 that the first plastic bottle was made, but widespread use wasn't utilized until the 1960s (3). In today's world, it's nearly impossible to find processed food products in glass jars or bottles, but are our processed foods safe in such plastic containers? Back in 2008, I wrote my own article expressing my viewpoints over the safety factor of plastic containers. I not only included and explained in detail the various forms of plastics being used for holding processed food products, but I also indicated the great possibility that no matter what type of plastic was being used the chemical make-up of plastic could leach into our foods over a period of time(4).

While there are a variety of types of plastic containers that are used to store our processed food and drinks, and are given numbers from 1 to 7, the most toxic of all plastics is the #7, known as Bisphenol A, or simply known as BPA. Some years ago, there was great concern due to the fact that baby bottles were made out of BPA plastic. Today's parents can opt for BPA-free bottles, yet baby bottles made from BPA have yet to completely banned. Over the years despite the fact that more evidence keeps cropping up about the dangers of this rather lethal form of plastic and the health risks it can cause (5) it is still being used as the lining of cans of powdered and liquid infant formula.(6) BPA is also found as a lining in canned goods, anywhere from processed soups and meals, such as chili, stews, ravioli, (including single serving microwaveable containers), tomato paste and sauce, pie fillings, and also canned vegetables and fruits, juices, and soda. (7) (8)

What does the FDA have to say about the safety factor of BPA in our processed foods?

From what I've been reading it seems the FDA is aware of the health risks with the usage of BPA, yet they still contend no conclusive evidence has been found to ban it completely. The FDA itself even has suggestions and guidelines on how to minimize BPA exposure (10). The known health risks involved with exposure due to foods or drinks stored in BPA containers range from an increase risk of cancer, heart disease, and diabetes just to name a few (11) (12).

All in all, the FDA's contention that BPA is still safe shouldn't surprise any of us. Throughout my series of articles I will reveal that time and time again, the FDA maintains that any and all food industry practices that are used are safe despite continuing growing evidence on the contrary. If I sound like a cynic about the FDA, I am. And so should you.

A Possible Ban On All Products With BPA?

Despite all the evidence pointing to the dangers of BPA usage throughout the years, I can't help thinking that It seems rather odd to me that the USA is lagging behind in completely banning BPA products, while Canada, Denmark, China and most European countries, such as France have banned it completely. One step in the right direction however, is that the Campbell Soup Company, which turns out to have the highest levels of BPA found in their canned foods, recently announced that it does plan to ban the usage of lining it's cans with BPA, yet the company still contends that BPA poses no serious health risks. (13)

And now for the very latest news which I recently came across: the FDA is now considering a complete banning of BPA in all products where it has been used and is to make their decision soon. All I can say is, it's about time. However, before anyone can breathe a sigh of relief, it could take years before BPA is completely phased out and eliminated completely, after all, just think how many products are out there that still have BPA. One nagging question I have though, what will BPA be replaced by, and more important, will it be safer? Only time will tell.

SOURCES

Labeling Foods That Have GE/GMO Ingredients:

GMO Food Labeling (1)

Labeling of Genetically Engineered Foods (2)


History of Plastics and Safety Factors:

Glass Bottles (3)

Natural News Article about BPA (5)

Rodale Article About BPA (6)

The Daily Green Article About BPA (7)

BPA In Canned Soups and Drinks (8)

Plastic Safety (9)

FDA And Safety of BPA (10)

BPA Dangers(11)

Obesity and Diabetes Link with BPA (12)

Campbell Soup Company To Eliminate BPA(13)

FDA Possible Ban Of BPA

BPA Side Effects

History of Plastic Bottles


Product Review: Review of Vito Marcello's Tomato Basil Marinara Sauce

(Originally Published at Yahoo.Voices formerly Associated Content~3/12/2012)

ABSTRACT: Review of Vito Marcello's Tomato Basil Marinara Sauce is a delightful all natural blend of chunks of tomatoes in a thick tomato pureé with a hearty burst of basil flavor.

CONTENT: I have to admit I love using tomato-based pasta sauces in many of my cooking endeavors, whether I'm making my Chicken Cacciatore, Chicken Parmesan, giving an additional tomato zest and flavor to my homemade beef stews, to simple pasta dishes. Rather than always sticking to the old tried and true well-known brands of pasta sauces such as Ragu or Prego, I'm always on the look-out to try brands of pasta sauce I'm not too familiar with. Recently I had the opportunity to try a brand of pasta sauce that just happened to be a new featured item of the week that was available in my local Duane Reade store.

I have to confess I never heard of the Vito Marcello brand before, but since I was planning to make my homemade Chicken Parmesan that night, I needed some kind of pasta sauce and decided to take a chance and I bought the 24 ounce jar of the Vito Marcello's Tomato Basil Marinara Sauce at a cost of $4.99. Being an avid reader of labels, I was impressed by the fact that the sauce had no preservatives in it and had all natural ingredients consisting of: blended tomatoes, imported Italian Plum tomatoes, Sweet Onions, Extra Virgin Olive Oil, Natural Flavorings, Fresh Roasted Garlic, Salt, Pepper, a blend of Vito Marcello's special House Spices, and of course, the Basil itself.

Once home I began fixing my planned dinner and came the taste test itself. Upon opening the jar, I stirred it up a bit and saw that there were chunks of the plum tomatoes in a thick tomato pureé and I was very aware of seeing the basil itself, and no wonder it's called "basil" marinara sauce, for indeed there was a delightful burst and taste of the basil. One thing I found rather surprising however, was the fact that the sauce didn't have an overwhelming salty taste to it the way other pasta sauces may have. According to the Nutrition Facts on the label, one serving size, which is 1/2 cup has only 170 mg. of sodium, which is way below the usual 300 mgs. or more found in most other pasta sauces and ideal for anyone on a low sodium diet. I'm fortunate that I'm not on any kind of sodium restricted diet, however, I really don't care for overly salty foods myself and never add salt to my own cooking, so this made for an ideal pasta sauce.

Being curious about the Vito Marcello brand in general, I discovered that there is a website that lists other brands of his Pasta Sauces, which includes his Fra Diavolo Sauce, Puttanesca Sauce, Roasted Garlic & Eggplant, Sunday Sauce and Vodka Sauce, as well as his Classic Creamy Italian Dressing. As an added bonus on the website one can watch YouTube videos of Vito Marcello preparing some of his favorite dishes as well as the ability to download some of his recipes in PDF format. For those wanting a little background and history of the Marcello family in general, one can read how they got their start back in 1927 with their Marcello's Family Restaurant in Rhode Island and then later moving in 1988 and began Bellini's Restaurant in Conway, New Hampshire. The information on the website also indicates however, that the Vito Marcello's brand of sauces are unfortunately only available in the northeastern section of the USA, however, one can order directly on-line if one so wishes, and I just might do that, since the one downside is that the Duane Reade store that I bought the jar of pasta sauce only has the one flavor of Tomato Basil Marinara Sauce.

As for my planned dinner that night? Well all I can say is that my Chicken Parmesan which I served it with a side dish of linguine was a hit that night and I couldn't wait to use the sauce for my other recipes calling for tomato pasta sauce. On a scale of one to ten I would rate this sauce a sure winner ten!

The complete Nutrition Facts of Vito Marcello's Tomato Basil Marinara Sauce are as follows: One Serving Size which is 1/2 cup has 90 Calories, 25% Calories from Fat, Total Fat is 3 grams, 0 grams Saturated Fat, 0 grams Trans Fat, 0 Mg Cholesterol, 170 grams of Sodium, 13 grams of Total Carbohydrates which includes 4 grams of Dietary Fiber and 11 grams of Sugar.

Sources:

Life

Vito Marcello's Website:
Vito Marcello

ARTICLE: New Jersey to Propose Legislation to Label Feral Cats as "Exotic": Legislation that Could Mean Open Season to Feral Cats and Hunted as Wildlife

(Originally Published at Yahoo.Voices formerly Associated Content~9/7/2010)

ABSTRACT: New Jersey is proposing legislation to reclassify feral/stray cats as wildlife and therefore could be hunted down and killed. (UPDATE: While this legislation wasn't passed in New Jersey, there are similar proposals in other states to change the status of feral and stray cats to "wildlife")

CONTENT: Yes you heard right. This idea by the New Jersey Game, Fish and Wildlife is not exactly a new one, as it was first proposed as long ago as 2007. The whole idea is to change the status of feral and stray cats into "exotic" and dangerous animals that pose a threat to the natural wildlife in New Jersey, and by changing the status would allow people to hunt cats in the same manner as deer, rabbits, bear, etc.

I think most people are aware that in many areas, there are large populations of feral and stray cats and yes perhaps considered a nuisance, however, the many TNR (trap, neuter, release) programs available have proven effective in that by trapping the cats, spaying/neutering them then releasing does bring the cat population down. One such advocate of the TNR means is Alley Cat Allies, a forerunner in this program. To do the TNR method is also more cost effective, rather than the other means of dealing with the feral/stray cat issue, which is for Animal Care and Control to trap, bring to a shelter then euthanized. To do this latter method means that these feral/stray cats in effect take up shelter space in a system already bulging to the seams with unwanted cats, and little or zero hope of them being adopted out.

I don't think passing legislation to include feral/stray cats as "wildlife" and can be hunted down is the answer. The rational of the people proposing this idea is that feral cats interfere with the natural wildlife of New Jersey by hunting rodents, rabbits and birds. Like duh? I see this as a natural order of the chain cycle, and especially in the case of rodents keeps the population down of such animals--one only has to remember what happened in the Medieval period of history where cats were rounded up and killed due to superstitions of the time that cats were evil and witches familiars...what happened? Since the cats were killed off the rat population went rampart, and created the devastating Black Death since the rats were carriers of the Bubonic Plague.

As I see it too, if such legislation is passed, I almost guarantee that sooner or later domestic cats belonging to people will become the unfortunate victims. Yes, in my opinion, cats should be kept indoors when they belong to someone, but often cat owners will allow their cats to go outdoors to roam, and also, even when pet owners do confine their cats indoors sometimes there is the chance of the cat(s) escaping.

If you're interested in reading up more about this proposed plan just google Legislation Proposed For Cats To Be Hunted In New Jersey, not only will you find articles but many petitions to sign should you wish to do so, however I've included sources at the end of this article one can click on.

Here is one such article, and with it is a link to the on-line contact form to the NJ Fish, Game and Wildlife should you wish to voice your opinion.

While I'm not a resident of New Jersey,I decided to email the New Jersey Fish and Wildlife to voice my opinion and here's my letter to them:
________________
I, as well no doubt many other people, totally oppose plans to pass legislation in New Jersey that would reclassify feral and/or stray cats as "exotic and therefore dangerous" and thus allowing the idea that cats can be hunted down in the same manner as deer, bear, coyote, etc., when TNR is and has proven to be an effective means to keep the feral/stray cat population down.

Those who are pro for the idea of reclassifying feral/stray cats as "exotic" claim that feral/stray cats threaten the natural "wildlife" of New Jersey since they hunt rabbits, birds, rodents, etc. Somehow I and many others don't buy this as an excuse to change the status of feral/stray cats into the "exotic" status that would allow them to be hunted down and killed. One only has to reflect what happened during the Medieval period of history when cats were systematically rounded up and killed due to the superstitions of those times, being that they were considered as "evil" and familiars of witches. The result? The Black Death due to the rise of the rodent population that carried the Bubonic Plague.

Also, by changing the status of feral/stray cats into targets for hunters to be killed in the same manner as deer during hunting season, we in effect would be no better than China, a country noted for skinning cats alive for the fur trade, and selling live cats in open market places as a food; something many of us in the USA are totally and fervently opposed to. Here in America, cats whether wild or as pets are associated and considered companion type animals, not wildlife and certainly not an animal to be hunted down, skinned for fur or eaten.

Lastly, if such legislation is passed, I almost guarantee that sooner or later domestic cats belonging to people will become the unfortunate victims. Yes, in my opinion, cats should be kept indoors when they belong to someone, but often cat owners will allow their cats to go outdoors, and also, even when pet owners do confine their cats indoors sometimes there is the chance of the cat(s) escaping.

Passing such legislation to reclassify cats as "exotic" is NOT the answer--cats should not be classified in the same manner as other "game" and wildlife, but in my opinion, further efforts for the TNR means and system should be encouraged.

______________

Well lo and behold I got a response back from them and here it is:

______________

I do not know where the misinformation you and others are reacting to is coming from.

There is no legislation or proposal of any sort to allow the hunting of cats.

There is a developing body of information and research findings that indicate feral cats pose a significant threat to wildlife through predation and transmission of diseases.

The NJ Endangered and Nongame Species Advisory Committee (Committee) and the NJ Fish and Game Council (Council) have responded to this by passing a joint resolution acknowledging the detrimental impact of free-roaming cats on wildlife and strongly stating that TNR (Trap-Neuter-Return) is not an effective means of reducing the feral cat populations and thus not an effective means of addressing the impacts of cats on wildlife.

Both the Committee and the Council have stated that there is absolutely no consideration being given to allow hunting of feral cats. The Committee and Council have convened a working group to gather information regarding the issue of feral cats and to propose recommendations for effective policies and management measures to address the impacts of feral cats on wildlife. This working group will get input from local governments, including local animal control officers, and animal welfare organizations, wildlife experts and wildlife rehabilitators in formulating its recommendations.

These recommendations will be presented to the Department of Environmental Protection's Division of Fish and Wildlife for consideration in formulating a response to the concerns regarding feral cats and native wildlife. PT

Paul Tarlowe, Wildlife Education Specialist
NJFishandWildlife@dep.state.nj.us
The N.J. Division of Fish and Wildlife is a professional, environmental agency dedicated to the protection, management and wise use of the state's fish and wildlife resources.
http://www.NJFishandWildlife.com/

____________
As Jerry Seinfeld would say to such a response, yada yada yada. So much gobbledegook double-speak to my mind. Not only has the TNR system of taking care of the feral/stray cat population been an extreme success in many states, in most cases, these cats aren't always necessarily roaming free, but are confined to feral "colonies" where they are taken care of, that is volunteers and rescuers regularly feed them.

One can even read success stories of helping feral cats especially through the TNR program by the organization Alley Cat Allies which was founded in 1990.

To my mind, any legislation such as New Jersey is proposing could have detrimental effects, one being that it could create an open season for any cat, whether truly a stray/feral or a cat that is a pet caught roaming loose. Two, it could also attract people who hate cats and have a tendency toward animal cruelty and abuse issues and would thus give them "legal" cause to shoot cats.

Whether you're a resident of New Jersey or not, voice your opinion. Here's one petition via the Change.org site one can sign. Also I encourage people to write to the New Jersey Fish and Game itself.

Sources:

My Central Jersey

Lovemeow

Cats as Venison

Animals.change.org

Pets Weekly

CatDefender article 1

CaDefender article 2

ARTICLE: Gas Chambers and Heartstick Method of Euthanizing Unwanted Shelter Animals: The Horror of This Method of Euthanizing Still Exists

(Originally Published at Yahoo.Voices formerly Associated Content~4/15/2010)

ABSTRACT: Many people aren't aware that the cruel, horrific method of euthanasia by means of gas chambers and heartstick still exist in kill shelters. (UPDATE: I wrote this article some four years ago, to date only about 20 states have banned the use of gas chambers to "euthanize" shelter pets~July 12, 2014)

CONTENT: Having to put an animal down by euthanasia due to an serious illness is never, never an easy decision for the pet owner. We may feel guilty, like we're playing "God" and have no right to end the life of an animal companion that is part of our family, our child, in effect. But neither do we want our beloved "child" to needlessly suffer either. With sadness and overwhelming grief in our heart we take our beloved pet to our vet; we walk into the vet's office with our friend, and gently hold our companion animal for what will be the last time. We pet and caress our friend and talk soothingly, while trying to hold back the tears as the vet injects our friend with the liquid that won't cure but kill, an overdose of the blue or pink liquid, sodium phenobarbital.

I've had cats nearly all my life, since I was five, and while the vast majority of my pet companions, my babies, have lived long healthy lives, I've had to witness the above scene for those who were too ill to be helped, and I'm certain that many readers here who have owned pets have also had to go through this gut-wrenching agony of being faced with the decision of putting our pets down. However, the one solace we all should realize is that at least our pets were put down humanely, gently, and mercifully. Sadly, this isn't the case when it comes to the millions of shelter animals who must be killed due to overcrowding and lack of room for all the unwanted pets. For many municipal high kill shelters these animals are not euthanized humanely but cruelly and terrifyingly in gas chambers. Yes, sadly gas chambers do still exist. If these unwanted pets aren't killed in gas chambers, then another horrific way to "euthanize" them is what is called the heartstick method.

Prior to my involvement with the numerous Facebook groups that are geared toward ending this horrific, cruel way of euthanizing animals, I have to admit I wasn't aware that many unwanted shelter animals were killed by the thousands nationwide and on a weekly basis, if not sooner, via gas chamber or heartstick method. I assumed wrongly that the unwanted pets were put down humanely via lethal injection. One has to ask, why are these methods still being used in the first place? Is it cheaper, or a more convenient to kill animals this way? Surprisingly, the answer to the first part of the question is no, it's not cheaper. The irony is that It actually costs more to kill shelter pets via gas chamber than by lethal injection. According to the Change.org website, to kill an animal by carbon monoxide poisoning costs $4.98 per animal versus $2.29 per animal by lethal injection (EBI=Euthanasia By Injection). One can't help but think then that it's simply more "convenient" for these shelters to kill animals by gas chamber since more animals can be killed at the same time rather than individually by the injection method.

When news came out of what had occurred during Nazi Germany during World War II and it had become public knowledge of the gas chambers that were used to kill millions of Jews in concentration camps, the world was horrified to think that human beings could be killed like this. Therefore, for anyone who is an animal lover, it should be just as horrific to think that these poor innocent cats and dogs, whose only crime was that they weren't wanted, either by pet owners no longer wishing to keep their pet, or by the scores of pets that are allowed to breed, thus creating more litters of unwanted pets, to die this way. There are two types of "Euthanasia Chambers", as they are often called, that are used. The one type is a metal container about the size of a small garbage dumpster and are either top or side-loading, however, to my mind the worse are the "see-through" gas chambers where the gassing of the pets can not only be viewed by the shelter workers, but often by the other pets that are next in line to be killed.

I forced myself and watched with horror not long ago a video of one animal shelter in North Carolina where workers dragged out at least ten dogs to the gas chamber, piled the dogs inside, then locked it up. One of the workers then fed a tube from the carbon monoxide tank and hooked it up into the chamber, then walked away and turned the gas on. You HEAR the sounds of the dogs crying in agony while the gas is killing them. This is all being done while the still live dogs confined in large cages are watching and hearing all of this as their fellow canine friends are being killed. But the video isn't over yet. After an alloted time, the workers then begin dragging or carrying more dogs, mainly puppies out to the chamber, and place them right on top of the dead ones. The next scene shows the "chamber" being lifted up and the dead dogs are dumped in a garbage landfill. Don't be fooled due to the fact that this video was filmed in the late 1990's as this horrendous, cruel procedure of killing shelter animals by gas chamber still continues.

For those of you not familiar with the "heartstick" method of killing an animal, it's just as it sounds, that is a lethal injection is jabbed into the heart. The main problem however, is that quite often, the method and injection isn't done right, and the animal may be subjected to numerous injections before it's killed. Also, technically speaking, the proper method of the heartstick method of euthanizing an animal is to be done only after the animal has been sedated, yet it's not uncommon that sedation isn't used and such is the case in an undercover video Youtube video which was filmed in an animal shelter in Robeson County, North Carolina. The dogs are very much alive, often dragged one by one by long poles with a noose around their necks and done in such a fashion that it almost looks like an assembly line of killing these animals.

How many states still use the gas chamber method of killing animals? To my mind even one state that continues using this method is one too many. There are only about 18 or so states in the United States that to date that have completely banned the gas chamber method of euthanasia, including New York which only banned gas chambers in 2009. Many more states now have bills pending to be passed in legislation. One bill just recently passed by the Georgia House of Representatives and now is heading for approval in the state's Senate is Gracie's Law, H.B. 788. Gracie's Law was so named after a dog that was to be later named Amazing Grace. Grace had been placed in a gas chamber in the Liberty County Humane Shelter in Georgia with a number of other dogs, yet remarkably she survived the 30 minute ordeal of being gassed. If her survival seems a miracle, it's not, as many dogs can often survive the gassing process and have to be gassed all over again. To date however, some of the more "famous" states still using the gas chamber method are Ohio, Michigan, Kentucky, Utah, just to name a few. The worse state with the highest ratio of high kill shelters is North Carolina and is the top leader in the number of shelters statewide that uses this horrific form of "euthanizing". And what a joke to call it "euthanasia".

Now many people may wonder and ask, just why are are there so many unwanted pets in the first place to create this tragic situation and where so many unwanted pets are killed in shelters, whether by gas chamber, heartstick or even by injection to begin with? First, there are the puppy and kitten mills that are still prevalent and where animals are bred and bred and bred, over and over again. Thankfully more and more of these mill type breeders are being shut down. These breeders crank out animals like an assembly line and usually wind up in pet stores for sale. And don't kid yourself, it's not just a little local pet shop that sells puppies or kittens from these mills, but also some of those fancy high-priced pet stores in Beverly Hills, California where the likes of celebrities will get their dogs from, and they aren't even aware that those animals are coming from mills.

Then of course, you have people who get pedigree/purebreed cats or dogs, and insist on allowing their pet to breed. Many people are under the erroneous myth and assumption, that their pet, whether pedigree or not, should have at least one litter to make the pet happy and fulfilled. They are then further under the illusion that they easily find homes for the litters of puppies or kittens that are born.

The third reason for so many unwanted pets are those people who insist on adopting a pedigree/purebred pet from a licensed breeder just to have proper "papers" when if they took the trouble, would realize that there are just as many pedigree/purebred pets available at pet shelters and much cheaper. One can often get a purebred pet at a shelter for a mere $100 to $200, while buying from a breeder, can cost them up to $1,200 or even more.

Since I know a lot of pet rescuers, I remember it being told to me that for every single pet, cat or dog, to be adopted from every single shelter in the USA, EVERY single person would have to adopt at least nine pets. This is the grim statistics. Is is a wonder then so many unwanted animals are euthanized? Also, the sad fact is then that for every pet, whether a cat or dog that is bought from a breeder or pet shop, is literally condemning and putting a pet to death that is in a kill shelter.

By now, after reading this, you should feel frustrated, angry and sickened to realize that not only are so many unwanted pets killed routinely in shelters, but by horrific methods, so you may be asking what can I do?

1) First, one excellent suggestion I have is that if you aren't a member of Facebook already, by all means join. The are a lot of groups there that one can join that are dedicated for animal issues, particularly in giving voice to the issue of trying to get laws passed in all states to ban the use of gas chamber and heartstick methods of euthanasia. It is through these groups one can be informed of what is going on an almost daily basis, something one wouldn't have knowledge about by ordinary means, that is the media, since this type of news usually isn't told. There is even one group that was established to encourage Oprah Winfrey, a noted animal lover, to have a show dedicated in informing her viewers that the gas chamber and heartstick method of euthanasia still exists, and there is also a petition that one can sign and will eventually be sent to her.

2). From the sources I've listed below, particularly the Animal Law Coalition website one can find out if your particular state still uses the gas chamber/heartstick method of euthanasia. If you do find out that your state still practices this form of euthanasia, start a writing campaign to your elected officials, from assemblymen, congressmen, senators and governor to encourage them to pass a bill to ban the gas chamber/heartstick method and while yet, would still be considered killing unwanted animals, at least they should be euthanized via lethal injection. And needless to say, get your animal loving friends in on the writing campaign.

3). Do not buy a pet from a breeder or pet store, but adopt from a shelter. You'll be saving a life. Also, if you are personally thinking or know people who want to adopt a pet and they insist on wanting a pedigree/pure bred pet, once again go to a shelter as there are plenty of pedigree/purebred animals waiting for a forever home.

4). If you have just recently adopted a pet, or know someone who has, please, please, please spay/nueter the pet. By doing so, you or your friends will decrease the chance of having unwanted litters that will no doubt wind up in a shelter.

5). Lastly, bring an awareness of the gas chamber/heartstick method of euthanizing to the public. Many people don't realize it's still going on, and this would particularly hold true if you live in a state that still uses these forms of killing animals in shelters. Therefore, write an editorial to your newspapers, contact local TV news stations. The important emphasis is to get the message out of what is going on

Sources:

Listing of Gas Chamber States

This website contains a petition to sign and a graphic video (watch with discretion that is IF you can watch)

Gas Chamber Debate

Should Gas Chambers Be Banned

North Carolina Coalition for Humane Euthanasia

Gas Chamber Euthanasia

Gas Chamber Ban

Petition

Companion Animal Network

Probably one of the best sites to find out about the laws being passed to end gas chamber/heartstick method of "euthanizing" pets in shelters is the Animal Law Coalition

Gas Chambers article 290

Article 726

Article 65

Articles about "Amazing Grace"

Amazing Grace

AmazingGrace